After the Constituent Assembly failed to deliver the constitution, the prime minister should have resigned,” constitutional law expert Bipin Adhikari told AFP. “But even before that, he should have had an exit plan ready before the expiry of the…
(News24 Television, May 28, 2012) (on clip from15m15 sec) (“It was not expected of the Prime Minister to declare the date of election unilaterally as the leader of caretaker government. He should have been acting in consortium with other political…
(कान्तिपुर, जेठ १५, २०६९) (संवैधानिक कानुनका ज्ञाता डा. विपिन अधिकारी संविधानसभाले तय गरेका प्रक्रिया अत्यन्त महत्त्वाकांक्षी भएको ठान्छन् । किन ? ‘संविधानवाद बुझेका विज्ञहरूको भूमिका नखोजी राजनीतिक नेतृत्वले सबै काम आफैं गर्छु भन्ने हठ देखाउँदा यो दुर्दशा भयो,’ डा. अधिकारीको…
(The Kathmandu Post, May 23, 2012) Constitutional lawyer Bipin Adhikari said “Nepal does not seem to have a government that honours the verdicts issued by the courts” and that the move compromises the idea of an independent judiciary.
जेठ १४ पछिको संवैधानिक राजनैतिक स्थिति सम्बन्धमा बहस – कार्यक्रम नयाँ नेपाल, रमा पराजुलीसँग (बिबिसी नेपाली सेवा, २०६९ वैशाख ३०)
(The Kathmandu Post, April 24, 2012) Bipin Adhikari claimed that since the CC is being considered a structure parallel to the Supreme Court, there will be confusion as to who would be part of it given its time-bound nature.…
(Asia Times, April 18, 2012) Those who favorably viewed China’s interest and investment in West Seti took exception to the parliamentary committee’s intervention as encroachment on the powers of the executive wing of the state. “I was shocked to find…
(Asia 360 News in Context, April 13, 2012) Final Countdown: Parliament under pressure to meet May deadline for constitution
(BBC Nepali Service, April 13, 2012) राष्ट्रपतिले संविधान जारी गर्दा सर्त राख्न सक्छन् कि सक्दैनन ? – (न्युज कमेण्ट) सुरेन्द्र फुयाँलसँग
Protected by Security by CleanTalk