[pdf-embedder url=”http://bipinadhikari.com.np/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/पारमाणविक-तथा-रेडियोधर्मी-पदार्थको-विधेयक.pdf” title=”पारमाणविक तथा रेडियोधर्मी पदार्थको विधेयक”]
Category: Article
[pdf-embedder url=”http://bipinadhikari.com.np/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/तिन-महले-प्रमाण-ऐन-२०३१-1.pdf” title=”तिन महले प्रमाण ऐन, २०३१ (1)”]
[pdfjs-viewer url=”https%3A%2F%2Fbipinadhikari.com.np%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2020%2F01%2Freport-of-first-conference-of-the-chief-attorneys_1566544700.pdf” viewer_width=100% viewer_height=1360px fullscreen=true download=true print=true]
- संविधान र संघीय ऐन बमोजिम प्रस्तावित: गाउ सभा र नगर सभाले सम्पन्न गर्नुपर्ने कार्यहरु व्यवस्थित रुपमा सञ्चालन गर्नका लागि प्रस्तावित नियमावली, संविधान सभाबाट २०७२ साल असोज ३ गते घोषणा भएको नेपालको संविधान र २०७४ सालमा व्यवस्थापिका संसदबाट पारित स्थानीय सरकार सञ्चालन ऐनको व्यवस्था अनुकुल हुनेगरि तयार गरिएकोछ ।
- संघीयतामा स्थानीय तहको भूमिका स्थापित गर्ने: प्रस्तावित नियमावली संघीय संरचनामा आधारित नेपालको संविधानले व्यवस्था गरेको स्थानीय तह र संविधानको अनुसुची ८ मा उल्लेखित स्थानीय तहको एकल अधिकारको सूची एवं संविधानको अनुसुची ९ मा उल्लेखित संघ, प्रदेश र स्थानीय तहको साझा अधिकारको सूचीमा उल्लेखित विषयमा स्थानीय तहको भूमिका स्थापित गर्न गाउ सभा र नगर सभाले संसदीय प्रक्रिया बमोजिम विधेयक छलफल एवं पारित गरि ऐन बनाउंदा अपनाउन पर्ने प्रक्रियाको वृस्तित व्यवस्था गरेकोछ ।
- अधिवेशन र बैठक सञ्चालनः स्थानीय व्यवस्थापिका अर्थात गाउ सभा र नगर सभाको अधिवेशन आह्वान, सदस्यहरुलाई यसको सुचना प्रवाह एवं सभाको अधिवेशन र बैठक सञ्चालन के कसरी गर्ने भन्ने सम्बन्धमा बृस्तित व्यवस्था गरिएकोछ ।
- सभाका समिति: प्रस्तावित नियमावलीमा गाउ सभा र नगर सभाका कार्यहरुलाई व्यवस्थित गर्न, विधेयकहरुको दफावार छलफल गर्न, गाउ र नगर कार्यपालिकाबाट भए गरेका काम कारवाहीको समिक्षा एवं अनुगमन गर्न र स्थानीय तहको विकास निर्माणको कार्यहरुमा सभाका सवै सदस्यहरुको भूमिका स्थापित गर्न देहाएका समिति प्रस्ताव गरिएकोछ । सभाका सदस्यहरु देहायका मध्ये कुनै न कुनै समितिमा रहने व्यवस्था प्रस्ताव गरिएकोछ । समितिहरुमा सभाका सवै सदस्यहरुको सक्रियता बढ्नेछ ।
- गाउ र नगर सभामा गठन गर्न सकिने समिति: गाउ सभाका समिति: १. बजेट, पूर्वाधार विकास तथा कृषि समिति, २.शिक्षा, स्वास्थ्य, सामाजिक एवं समावेशीकरण समिति ३.शिक्षा, स्वास्थ्य, सामाजिक एवं समावेशीकरण समिति, ४. शुशासन समिति ५. लेखा समिति; नगर सभाका समिति: १. बजेट, पूर्वाधार विकास समिति, २. उद्योग, वाणिज्य र कृषि समिति, ३. शिक्षा, स्वास्थ्य, सामाजिक एवं समावेशीकरण समिति, ४. विधायन समिति, सुशासन समिति, ६. लेखा समिति ।
- स्थानिय कानून अर्थात विधेयक मस्यौदा गर्दा विचार गर्नुपर्ने विषयः संविधान बमोजिम अधिकारको विषयहरु, संघ र प्रदेश कानूनको व्यवस्था, आर्थिक स्रोत र संस्थागत संरचना, अदालतबाट प्रतिपादित सिद्धान्त, नजीर एवं आदेश, नेपाल गरेको अन्तराष्ट्रिय प्रतिवद्धता, अन्य स्थानीय तहले बनाएको कानून आदि विषयहरु विचार गरेर मात्र स्थानीय कानून तर्जुमा अर्थात मस्यौदा गर्नुपर्ने विषयहरु समावेश गरिएकोछ ।
- ऐन कानूनको आवश्यकता पहिचान र कानून मस्यौदाः सवै वडाका जनताको सुझावका आधारमा स्थानीय ऐनकानूनको आवश्यकता पहिचान गर्ने, जनताको राय सुझाव संकलनको विधि र प्रक्रिया, गाउ र नगर कार्यपालिकाले विधेयक तर्जूृमा गर्दा विज्ञ र कानून मस्यौदकारहरु रहेको मस्यौदा समिति बनाउने र स्थानीय तह भन्दा वाहिरका विषय विज्ञको पनि सेवा लिन सकिने ।
- सरकारी र गैर सरकारी विधेयक प्रस्तुत गर्न सकिने: गाउ कार्यपालिका र नगर कार्यपालिकाका सदस्यहरुले कार्यपालिकाको निर्णय अनुसार सरकारी विधेयक सभामा प्रस्तुत गर्ने । गाउ र नगर कार्यपालिकामा नरहेका गाउ सभा र नगर सभाका अन्य सदस्य वा सदस्यहरुले पनि कुनै विषयमा विधेयक मस्यौदा गरि गाउ र नगर सभामा गैर सरकारी विधेयक दर्ता गर्न सक्ने । गैर सरकारी विधेयक मस्यौदा गर्न र यसका प्रतिहरु तयार गर्न गाउ र नगर सभा सचिवालयले सदस्यहरुलाई सहयोग गर्नुपर्ने विषय उल्लेख गरिएकोछ ।
- गाउ र नगर सभामा विधेयक दर्ता गर्दा विधेयकमा समावेश हुनपर्ने विषयहरु, संशोधन विधेयकमा हुनपर्ने ३ महले, सभाका सबै सदस्यलाई विधेयक वितरण, विधेयकको विरोधको सुचना, विधेयक सभामा प्रस्तुत गर्ने विधि र प्रक्रिया, सभामा विधेयकको सैद्धान्तिक छलफल, विधेयकमा संशोधनको समय, संशोधन र शर्तहरु, सदस्यहरुबाट प्राप्त संशोधन सहित विधेयक सभा वा विधायन समितिमा दफावार छलफल, सभाबाट विधेयक पारित गर्ने प्रक्रिया, सभाबाट पारित विधेयकको आनुषगिंक सुधार, सभाबाट पारित विधेयकको प्रमाणीकरण र सभाबाट पारित विधेयक अर्थात ऐन कानूनको प्रकाशन र प्रचार प्रसार गर्ने विषय समावेश गरिएकोछ ।
- गाउ र नगर सभामा बार्षिक बजेट पेश गर्ने र पारित गर्ने प्रक्रियाः बजेट तयारी छलफल एवं सभामा बजेट प्रस्तुत एवं छलफल, विनियोजन विधेयक, खर्च कटौतीको प्रस्ताव सम्बन्धी विषय, शर्त र छलफल, आर्थिक विधेयक अर्थात सो आर्थिक वर्षमा कुन कुन विषयमा के कति कर लगाउने हो सो सम्बन्धी विषयहरु समावेश गरिएकोछ ।
- सुन्य समय, विशेष समय, प्रश्नोत्तर, जरुरी सार्वजनिक महत्वको विषय, संकल्प छलफल र गाउ एवं नगर कार्यपालिकाको सम्बन्धीत सदस्यको जवाफ एवं सभामा संकल्प प्रस्ताव प्रस्तुत, छलफल, जवाफ र सभाबाट पारित संकल्प कार्यान्वयन गर्नुपर्ने विषय ।
- विशेषाधिकार ः गाउ र नगर सभा जनताबाट प्रत्यक्ष रुपमा निर्वाचित जनप्रतिनिधिमूलक संस्था भएकोले गाउ र नगर सभा एवं यसका सदस्यहरुको विशेषाधिकारको विषयहरु उल्लेख गएिकोछ ।
- सभाका सदस्यहरुको आचरण ः गाउ र नगर सभाका सदस्यहरु सभा र आफु सदस्य रहेको समितिको बैठकमा नियमित उपस्थिति हुने र जिम्वेवारी वहन गर्ने, सभा र समितिमा व्यक्तिगत फाइदा हुने कार्य गर्न नहुने, सभा र समितिको कार्यका लागि अन्य संस्था वा व्यक्तिबाट कुनै रकम, वस्तु वा सेवा लिन नहुने, सार्वजनिक नैतिकता, मर्यादा, सदाचारपूर्ण व्यवहार गर्नुपर्ने, समाजमा कुनै पनि किसिमको हिंसा र द्धन्द फैलाउने कार्य गर्न र संलग्न हुन नहुने आदि विषय समावेश गरिएकोछ ।
- सभाको बैठक खुला र पारदर्शि हुनुपर्नेः गाउ र नगर सभाका बैठकहरु जनता र संचार माध्यमका लागि खुला गर्नुपर्ने, सभामा दर्शक दिर्घाको व्यवस्था र संचार कक्षको व्यवस्था हुनुपर्ने विषय समावेश गरिएकोछ ।
- निवेदन पत्र समितिको व्यवस्था ः गाउपालिका र नगरपालिकासंग सम्बन्धित सार्वजनिक सरोकारका विषयमा कुनै व्यक्तिले सभा वा सभाको कुनै विषयगत समितिको ध्यानाकर्षणका लागि निवेदन दिन सक्ने र सो निवेदनको यथोचित सुनवाईको लागि गाउ र नगर सभाको सभाध्यक्षको अध्यक्षतामा निवेदन पत्र समिति गठन गर्ने व्यवस्था गरेकोछ ।
- सभा र नागरिक समाज अन्तरक्रिया समूह ः प्रस्तावित नियमावलीमा गाउ एव्ां नगर सभा र नागरिक समाज अन्तरक्रिया गर्ने विषय समावेश गरिएकोछ । यसका र सभाध्यक्षको अध्यक्षतामा सभा र नागरिक समाज अन्तरक्रिया समूह गठन गर्ने विषय रहेकोछ । यस समूहमा जेष्ठ नागरिक, महिला बालबालिका, दलित, अपांग, स्थानीय तहमा वसोवास गर्ने विभिन्न समुदाय र जनजातिको प्रतिनिधित्व हुने व्यवस्था रहकोछ ।
- सार्वजनिक सुनवाई ः गाउ एवं नगर सभा र नागरिक समाज अन्तरक्रिया समूहले गाउ कार्यपालिका, नगर कार्यपालिका, गाउ सभा र नगर सभाका कामकारवाहीका सम्बन्धमा प्रत्येक वडामा नियमित रुपमा सार्वजनिक सुनवाई गर्ने व्यवस्था गरेकोछ ।
चीनका सिचुवान विश्वविद्यालय, दक्षिण एशियाली अध्ययन केन्द्रका प्रमुख प्राडा दाइ योङहोङले बेल्ट एन्ड रोड इनिसिएटिभअन्तर्गत चीनको राष्ट्रिय रेल्वे सञ्जालमा नेपाल र भारतलाई समेत जोडिन सक्ने सम्भावना रहेको बताए ।
मदन भण्डारी फाउन्डेशनले आज यहाँ ‘बेल्ट एन्ड रोड इनिसिएटिभः भू–राजनीतिलाई भन्दा पूर्वाधार विकासलाई प्राथमिकता’ विषयक संवाद कार्यक्रमको आयोजना गर्यो।
सो अवसरमा चीनका सिचुवान विश्वविद्यालय, दक्षिण एशियाली अध्ययन केन्द्रका प्रमुख प्राडा दाइ योङहोङले बेल्ट एन्ड रोड इनिसिएटिभअन्तर्गत चीनको राष्ट्रिय रेल्वे सञ्जालमा नेपाल र भारतलाई समेत जोडिन सक्ने सम्भावना रहेको बताए।
काठमाडौँ विश्वविद्यालय स्कुल अफ ल का डिन डा विपिन अधिकारीले बेल्ट एन्ड रोड इनिसिएटिभः भूराजनीतिलाई भन्दा पूर्वाधार विकासलाई प्राथमिकता विषयक कार्यपत्र प्रस्तुत गर्दै चिनियाँ राष्ट्रपति सी जिनपिङले सन् २०१३ मा अघि सारेको बेल्ट एन्ड रोड इनिसिएटिभ कार्यक्रम अहिले विश्वव्यापी सहमतिको विषय भइसकेको बताए।
नेपालसहित विश्वका ६७ देशले बीआरआई चीनसँग सहकार्य गर्न सम्झौता गरेका छन् । नेपालले आफ्नो विकासका निम्ति उत्तर र दक्षिण फर्कनुको सट्टा विश्वव्यापी दृष्टिकोण राख्नुपर्ने कार्यपत्रमा उल्लेख छ ।
कार्यपत्रमा भनिएको छ, “बीआरआई विकासको कुनै एउटा पक्षलाई मात्र ध्यान दिने कार्यक्रम होइन, यसले ठूला पूर्वाधार निर्माण, व्यापार विस्तार, जनस्तरको सम्बन्ध विकास, शिक्षा, स्वास्थ्यलगायत गरिबी निवारणलाई पनि समेटेको छ ।”
व्यापार र लगानीका लागि विकासशील मुलुकलाई आर्थिक स्रोत उपलब्ध गराउनु बीआरआईको एउटा प्रमुख उद्देश्य हो । यसका लागि एशिया इन्फ्रास्ट्रक्चर इन्भेस्टमेन्ट बैङ्कको स्थापना पनि भएको छ । जसको प्रमुख लगानीकर्ता चीन, भारत र रशिया छन् ।
शान्ति र सहयोग, खुलापन र समावेशीकरण, पारस्परिक सिकाइ तथा पारस्परिक लाभ बीआरआईका यी चार अाेटा प्रमुख विशेषता हुन् । बीआरआईका विभिन्न नौ अाेटा कनेक्टिभिटी कोरिडोरमध्ये चीन–नेपाल–भारत कोरिडोर पनि एउटा हुन सक्ने कार्यपत्रमा उल्लेख छ ।
यो कार्यक्रम भू–राजनीतिक एजेन्डा नभएर विकास र पारस्परिक सहयोगको योजना हो । यसको फाइदा लिन सके नेपाल दुई ढुङ्गा बीचको तरुल नभएर दुई ठूला आर्थिक शक्ति बीचको मोति हुन सक्ने पनि कार्यपत्रमा उल्लेख छ ।
[६ भाद्र २०७५, बुधबार १०:५६ रासस]
Report on the Conference by Convenor Dr. Bipin Adhikari
13 August 2018
The Conference on the Constitution of Nepal
11-13 August 2018
Hotel Soaltee, Tahachal, Kathmandu
Kathmandu University School of Law & the South Asia Trust
Rt Hon’ble Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli
Hon’ble Ministers / Former Ministers
Members of Parliament
Prof Dr Ram Kantha Makaju Shrestha, VC, Kathmandu University
Prof Suresh Raj Sharma, Founding Vice Chancellor, Kathmandu University
Senior Advocate Daman Nath Dhungana, Chairperson, KU Trusteeship Council
Distinguished guests
Ladies and Gentlemen
It gives me great pleasure to welcome you to this concluding session of the three day international conference on the new Constitution of Nepal. The Conference was a productive and satisfying event in terms of the quality of discussions and the diversity of the experts, practitioners and stakeholders who participated. I am glad to make this quick report on behalf of The Southasia Trust and the Kathmandu University School of Law (KUSL).
The opening plenary of this Conference on the evening of 11 August was addressed by President Rt. Hon. Bidya Devi Bhandari with addresses also by Subhas C Nembang, Chair of CA I & II and the Bangladesh jurist Kamal Hossain, among others.
Over the last two-and-half days, besides the opening session and this closing session, we held three plenaries and nine panel discussion under broad themes from constitutionalism, rule of law, economy to inclusion and implementation. There were three ‘focus sessions’ devoted to topics that we did not want to miss out under the broad themes – on motherhood, citizenship and the Constitution, on the place of the marginalised under the Constitution, and a look back at the Constitution of 1990.
Over the period of the Conference, approximately 7 dozen panelists and commentators shared their opinions and interacted among 220 participants. Twenty-five of the panelists and commentators were international experts, and many others expressed their point of view from the floor.
The Constitution was discussed against the background of Nepal’s constitutional and legal history, and the workings of the two constituent assemblies were addressed in detail. Issues such as rule of law and checks and balances, fundamental rights, federal structures, electoral system and inclusiveness, economic constitutionalism, the Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court, and other matters were discussed in relation to the new Constitution.
Efforts were made to look at the new Constitution against the perspective of comparative constitutionalism, keeping in view the experience of India, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, in particular, as well as the United States and the countries of Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. Some other international contexts were also taken into account. There was significant discussion on the implementation of Constitution, including most importantly the need for required laws and also the calls for amendment. By and large, the Constitution was singled out for its norms, values, institutions and procedures, while worries were expressed about implementation pathways. Several participants pointed out the need for reforming the text of the Constitution through amendments, to enhance ownership across the country and communities.
On the whole, the discussion in the Conference, happening for the first time nearly three years after promulgation, was able to bring forth ideas which will serve as profound commentary on the text. We have had a team of rapporteurs at work, and over the next two months will be processing all the papers, commentaries, opinions and concerns expressed in order to come out with a Conference Report. Thereafter, we plan to hold countrywide discussions even as our editorial team works on a book-lengths publications in Nepali and English.
For this closing session, with your permission, I would summarise some key points that came up during discussion:
• The experts and participants emphasised consistent and rigorous implementation of the Constitution. Those provisions that provide for support of the weaker sections of society must be given priority. The most deprived and marginalised communities must find the Constitution to their advantage, and this requires efficient writing and implementation of laws.
• The results of the three tier elections held in 2017 under the new Constitution must be reviewed to make sure that the electoral system protects the concerns of the people who have been affected in the matter of representation. Initiatives should be taken to reform the laws, where necessary.
• The laws regarding political parties and proportional representation should be reviewed in the best interest of the indigenous people and other marginalized groups.
• The federalisation initiative must get a boost to make it faster and effective, as the work thus far has been unsatisfactory. The delays have been due to the enormity of the task ahead and our capacity to work out necessary laws and procedures, but there is no way out but to get on with the task. The government should continue to work with the provinces and local governments to complete the unfinished task, and urgently complete the transition.
• The passage of major legislation to implement the commitment of the state to materialise fundamental rights is important. For example, the women’s rights under the Constitution,as well as the rights of sexual minorities, need appropriate legislation for their implementation.
• More model laws are necessary as a reference for the use by local and provincial governments. The Federal Government should make necessary arrangements to help develop necessary knowledge and skills.
• It is urgent to immediately fulfill the staffing requirements of local and provincial governments, and effective transfer of power is required.
• The government should do everything possible to reform the laws regarding the Judicial Council and Constitutional Council, and ensure quality in recruitment, transfer, disciplinary action and dismissal of judges. The law to regulate parliamentary hearing should also be enacted to make sure that legal standards are met with in this regard.
As promised, we the organisers of the Conference on the Constitution of Nepal, will be coming out with detailed analysis and recommendations within a couple of months. This has been an attempt to provide a summary of the discussions and conclusions of the Confernece. We will be submitting our forthcoming reports to the Rt. Hon. Prime Minister as well as the participants and stakeholders in due course.
I thank you for listening.
Bipin Adhikari
Convenor of the Conference
[Soaltee Crowne Plaza, Kathmandu]
Rt Hon’ble President Madam Bidya Devi Bhandari
Hon’ble Subas Chandra Nemwang, Chair of Constituent Assembly I & II
Dr Ram Sharan Mahat, Member CA I & II, and Former Minister
Dr Kamal Hossain, Constitutional Expert, Bangladesh
Professor M. P. Singh, Constitutional Expert, India,
Professor Qianfan Zhang, Constitutional Expert, China
Professor Suresh Raj Sharma, the Founding Vice Chancellor of Kathmandu University
Senior Advocate Daman Nath Dhungana, the Chairperson of Kathmandu University Trusteeship Council
Dr Ram Kantha Makaju Shrestha, VC, Kathmandu University
Distinguished guests
Ladies and Gentlemen,
It is with great honor and privilege that we welcome each and every one of you to this Conference on the 2015 Constitution of Nepal on behalf of the Southasia Trust and Kathmandu University School of Law.
I heartily welcome our distinguished guests, from near and far, some of whom have journeyed long to join us here in Kathmandu to discuss an incredibly significant document in the history of Nepal.
Please allow me a moment to recognize the presence of the head of state the Right Honourable Bidya Devi Bhandari. Additionally, a special welcome to our international guests from more than a dozen countries who have joined us here today. And of course, we are grateful for the attendance of approximately 150 participants including panelists, commentators and presiding experts and practitioners.
Nepal has a new Constitution again. The document promulgated in 2015 is our latest effort to live with constitutional democracy and constitutionalism. It must be recalled that we had new constitutions in 1948, 1951, 1959, 1962, 1990 and 2007 as well. So, we are a country and people that have already tasted six constitutions in the span of 59 years; the 7th constitution was drafted over a span of approximately eight years. However, the 7th Constitution is distinct in several ways. To begin with, this is the first Constitution in Nepal built and adopted by an elected Constituent Assembly through a protracted political process. This is the first republican constitution. While these features add to the democratic credentials of the document, these changes must be understood in a larger political context.
The new Constitution builds on the consolidated parliamentary system of government at the federal and provincial levels. It now has additional features to ensure stability in the parliamentary leadership. A three-tier system of cooperative federalism has been worked out, that allows the local governments separate constitutional competences and safeguards. There is a 7-province model at work. The list of fundamental rights guaranteed to Nepali citizens has been revised again. Many socio-economic and cultural rights find a place of prominence in the Constitution. The directive principles and policies of the state, which explain the constitutional horizon of the change, although not enforceable at any court, will now be under the jurisdiction of the parliament. There are now parliamentary machinery and procedures that will monitor the efforts of the state to realize these constitutional commitments.
The right to proportional inclusion, that allows participation in the state structures to almost 16 groups of deprived and marginalized people, remains the vanguard of the new constitutional design. Many new constitutional commissions have been created to ensure protection to the people, who need extra care. There are efforts to ensure equality, identity and protection of sub-cultures. The state has become secular. The system of judiciary remains integrated for all levels, but the Constitution has created judicial committees of elected officials that allow them to exercise judicial power that is most relevant at the grassroots level. I will leave the further evaluations of these themes for the discussions in the next two days. All I want to emphasize here is that the nature of the state in Nepal is in the process of change, and this change, in the matter of executive, legislature and judiciary as well the rights of the people, will become qualitative as we focus our efforts in strengthening the regime with interaction with the most vulnerable and deprived communities. This calls for responsible and participative law making.
The 2015 Constitution of Nepal is a document of compromise of competing values, norms, standards and procedures. After over 67 years of challenges including great political upheavals, change of guard in the political leadership, continuing economic deprivation, a violent conflict of a decade, geopolitical pressures, and victimisation of the constitutional process, we have finally been handed a document that makes new promises to the people. It upholds the principles of equality, diversity and growth. Anyone who has read the 2015 Constitution will agree that it reflects and addresses the subtleties of the makeup of Nepali society, with its diversity in demography, culture and geography. Whichever way one looks at it, the promulgation of this Constitution was a significant event because it completes the peace process, closes the uncertainties regarding the political system and paves the way for future constitutional progress.
I believe that the life of a successful constitution, no matter how democratic and human rights-oriented it is, depends on its consistent and effective implementation as well as timely reforms based on new developments in the country. Only when we, as the people, are able to foster a progressive and forward-looking environment can a constitution truly evolve to reflect a society, its people and their challenges. Without such an environment for rigorous implementation, continuing reviews and engaged citizens, the constitution is, what Late Prime Minister B. P. Koirala said, only “a straw of corn,” after all. In other words, as Albert Einstein famously stated, “The strength of the Constitution lies entirely in the determination of each citizen to defend it. Only if every single citizen feels duty bound to do his share in this defense are the constitutional rights secure.”
This Conference gives us the opportunity to understand Nepal’s new Constitution, analyze its contents, look into it in the larger socio-economic and comparative context, and review the implementation challenges. It has been three years since the Constitution was promulgated; the implementation of many articles in the Constitution has been set in motion. The norms and standards defined by the Constitution have begun to materialize. Three years later, however, we still see new challenges unfolding, and we must stay open-minded and progressive if we are to truly make this Constitution a document of our time. I am sure our deliberations here will help us look backward and move ahead with renewed determination.
In spending the long but rewarding hours preparing for this Conference, I have hoped that it is productive and informational to all our attendees. Through the panels that we have organized for the next two days, I hope that we are able to exercise timely thoughts, analysis, and conclusions on various discussions topics, which span from the constitutional rule of law, checks and balances to the rights of marginalized to vulnerable communities, inclusion, federalization and many other important issues.
I expect that this Conference will achieve its objective of creating a pool of knowledge that will help the country and people move forward with renewed faith and determination.
Before I conclude I also want to thank First President Dr Ram Baran Yadav for kindly sending his written message to the organizers for the successful completion of this Conference.
Thank you once again for being here.
[Convenor Dr Bipin Adhikari introducing the Conference at the Launching of The Conference on the Constitution of Nepal, August 11, 2018]
[pdf-embedder url=”http://bipinadhikari.com.np/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/qani1jw7ctvtbf20.pdf”]
[pdf-embedder url=”http://bipinadhikari.com.np/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/pnn8n8ef6pt39lz3.pdf”]
Nepal and China have formed a joint technical team to expedite the construction of the first ever cross-border transmission line between these two countries. The 400 kV trans-Himalayan power line is expected to link Rasuwagadhi and Kerung across the Nepal China border.
The group, which consists of five representatives from each country, will appoint a consultant to prepare a detailed project report (DPR) and finalise the construction and funding modality. However, cross-border electricity projects are subject to numerous specific legal requirements, including requirements arising from international law and relevant supra-national and national legal systems.
The team was set up as per an understanding signed between State Grid Corporation of China (SGCC), the Chinese government appointed focal institution for the development of the power line, and the Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA), the state-owned power utility, during Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli’s recent visit to China.
Once the technical team prepares its roadmap, it will initiate the process to appoint a consultant to prepare the DPR for the project. The 400 kV transmission line will extend from Galchhi in Nepal to Shigatse in China. As only 80 km of the estimated 800-km length of the transmission line lies within Nepali territory, the NEA has asked the Chinese side to take the lead in developing the project. The Nepali portion of the power line will stretch from Galchhi in Dhading district to Rasuwagadhi on the border with China in the north, according to the NEA. The power utility has already finalised the alignment of the power line.
As a cross-border project, the construction of the transmission line will involve building and construction authorisations and permissions from both the countries. The technical team will have to agree on the processes first. An overall legal and regulatory framework should be put in place in both the countries that obliges and allows transmission system operators and regulators to pursue the development of transmission network infrastructure across and between national markets. Needless to say, this framework should include some form of operating and security standards. Each national regulator will need appropriate competences, independence and resources. These preparations will be necessary to expedite the project.
The job certainly takes time, as it involves legislative frameworks which are inevitably complex and varied.